Tuesday, January 26, 2010

BiblioCommons will get you your pie

Can you imagine how frustrating it would be if you went out to eat and ordered apple pie, and the server brought you Waldorf salad? You’d say, “I asked for pie,” and he’d say, “Well, this has apples in it. I thought the apples were the important part.”

This is kind of what it is like to search with our current online catalog (and the majority of other libraries’ online catalogs). But with BiblioCommons, we get to have a catalog that uses search algorithms that make sense! Huzzah! Ask for apple pie and you get apple pie!

Comparing keyword searches performed by both catalogs was most revealing. I used the suggested search term of “24,” expecting to get the DVD of episodes from the TV show of the same name. BiblioCommons returned the record for the expected DVD as number three on my list of search results (after 2 popular YA graphic novels, both entitled “24”). Our “old/current” Sirsi-based catalog placed at the top of the search results list a novel entitled Blue Moon and the easy fiction title Curious George at the Parade. Wha???? I scrolled through the first 100 search results (after that, my eyes got buggy), and the DVD of 24 was nowhere to be found.

Simple pleasures (things I like):
  • Not having to click “new search” when I want to look for a different item – I LOVE that the search box is always at the top of whatever page I am viewing.

  • I appreciate the “did you mean . . .?” feature when I’ve misspelled search words. So much better than showing me a list of those Library of Congress subject headings that start with the same letters as whatever I typed. Not helpful.

  • Saving items for later. This is like shopping! Only without the guilt! And I love having all those titles I want to read when I’m done with school and my kids are a little older and I have more free time (and this is going to be . . . when?) saved in one place.
So far I have little to criticize. A couple of thoughts:
  • Having everything I rate or review added to a “my collection” list that everyone can then see makes me a little nervous. And yes, after searching the help documents I realize I can click “Add Details” and mark each item as private. However, this is sort of tedious to do every time I comment on an item, and time consuming because I have to do it for each item separately. I also have to remember to take this extra step! Is there any way to make all items in my collection private by default?
  • In the record for each item, instead of a field identifier like “author/creator” it says “Statement of Responsibility,” which is very much a cataloger’s term and probably doesn’t mean much to regular folks.
Overall the new catalog rocks. DBRL rocks! I can’t believe I’m crushing on a library catalog. But I am. Just a little. Because it brings me pie when I ask for it.

Everybody Sing Along

Thanks to my brother, here is a virtual mixed tape of "10 Best Songs About Libraries and Librarians." Any rap lyrics that reference the poet Keats are okay with me. Enjoy.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Free is Good

I love lists. To-do lists, bucket lists, packing lists, and now my library account's "for later" list where I can keep track of all of those books I intend to read once I'm done with school. And lists of free stuff? I love those even more. Thanks to the Librarian in Black, here is a list of free technologies and online tools budget-strapped libraries (or individuals) can use for word processing, staff scheduling, web site content management, conference calls, eBook providers, and much, much more.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Librarians as "User Experience" designers

For now I will ignore the fact that the abbreviation "UX" for "User Experience" bugs the crap out of me. There is something pretentious or faux-techie about it. I react in the same sort of way to products and advertisements that spell the word "extreme" as "Xtreme." *Shudder*

But I digress.

I like this article on The User Experience by Aaron Schmidt, and I particularly like this bit about empathy:

When we are mindful of our roles as library experience designers, we can make more informed design choices. This awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and demonstrate that we care about them.

Really. People will notice, though not necessarily consciously, if we take the time to think about them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating the skill of empathy, is the most important—and perhaps the most difficult—part of user experience design.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

YouTube can teach you to knit

Well, that isn't entirely true, but it's close. I had learned the basics of knitting from fellow knitters, but I wanted to try my hand at a pattern after creating about a thousand simple baby hats knit in the round on circular needles. The pattern I chose kept telling me to sl1k1psso, and I kept telling the pattern to freaking speak English already. Being a library type, I tried consulting a BOOK with diagrams. The diagrams looked like piles of spaghetti with knitting needles in the middle, and let's face it, trying to describe knitting techniques in words is nearly impossible. Here is where YouTube comes to the rescue.

Very kind, patient knitters out there in cyberspace have taken the time to create videos of techniques (like the aforementioned slip 1 knit 1 pass slip stitch over) so that visual learners like me don't set their yarn on fire or flush it down the toilet out of frustration. And they film these from the viewer's point-of-view, so it's like you are looking at your own hands knitting, which you will be once you've taken a gander at something like this:

Monday, January 4, 2010

So THAT is what RSS stands for

Really Simple Syndication! Genius.

I have to say, however, that my first tendency was to subscribe to waaaaaaay too many blogs and immediately become overwhelmed by all of the unread posts in my reader. Here are the newsfeeds to which I am currently subscribing. Because this is a work-related exercise, I did not add The Society for Librarians* Who Say [a bad word I won't type here but you know what it is], but I was very, very tempted.

1. The Librarian in Black
http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/

2. In the Library with the Lead Pipe
http://inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/feed/

3. Librarian and Information Science News
http://www.lisnews.org/rss.xml

4. Library Journal News
http://feeds.feedburner.com/LibraryJournalNew